Ever read a book and come to a part that gets you all hot and bothered, and not in a good way? You know, you're zipping along through the story and BAM: you're suddenly subjected to some author's ridiculous version of erotica. And as you try to erase the look of disgust--or incredulity--from your face, you think to yourself, "Why, dear God, why?" Well, fellow reader, take comfort in the fact that you're not alone. Indeed, there's an actual annual award given for the year's worst, I repeat, WORST, erotic writing. It's called the Literary Review Bad Sex in Fiction award, and it was established "with the aim of gently dissuading authors and publishers from including unconvincing, perfunctory, embarrassing or redundant passages of a sexual nature in otherwise sound literary novels." (Laurell K. Hamilton, I'm looking right at you, and if you actually wrote literary novels you'd win this hands down. Every year.) So you're probably wondering who, ahem, is up for it this year. Here's the shortlist: James Buchan for The Gate of Air
Simon Montefiore for Sashenka
John Updike for The Widows of Eastwick
Kathy Lette for To Love, Honour and Betray
Alastair Campbell for All in the Mind
Rachel Johnson for Shire Hell
Isabel Fonseca for Attachment
Ann Allestree for Triptych of a Young Wolf
Russell Banks for The Reserve
Paulo Coelho for Brida
Update: Rachel Johnson is the winner of the 2008 Literary Review Bad Sex in Fiction Award! Unfortunately--or fortunately, depending on your perspective, we don't own a copy of Shire Hell here at the library, but I'm sure the requests for it will start pouring in. Now get your minds out of the gutter!






